Nicely place, but I'll increase that it absolutely was Alpher and Hermann that theorized this background commencing in 1948. They received much too minor support and ended their investigation in 1953.
In intergalactic space—the extensive expanses among galaxies—the density is incredibly low, with estimates suggesting under a person hydrogen atom per cubic meter. Simply click to develop...
Feb 27, 2025 George² J What's the Cosmic Harmony? How come we see motions in reverse like black holes pushing and instead of galaxies currently being pushed away, it really is attracted? jhixon
My speculation posits that mild acts to be a stationary System of existence, as opposed to a recording medium. I advise that mild influences the habits of particles and objects from the universe And that i’m enthusiastic about exploring how this standpoint can provide insights into existing phenomena.
If take into account light as being a foundational medium, the act of observing or interacting with it (like turning on the flashlight) could stand for a disturbance in the light layer.
pjbierma stated: Can anyone remember to clarify to me the way it can be done making sure that Starship can land about the moon with out tipping around. It seems to possess a large Centre of gravity and it seems difficult in order that it's going to land on a very easy stage spot. Click on to extend...
But could it be attainable to find out the temperature of deep space to a greater diploma of accuracy? An attempt is built to find out the temperature of Deep space using Wien's law of displacement and the height frequency received: Beginning with Wien’s Displacement Legislation for frequency:
Thank you on your question! Indeed, you’ve captured the essence of my speculation accurately. I propose that gentle functions as a static framework or lattice upon which all particles and objects exist and transfer Click to develop...
The combination Obviously may differ tremendously through the centre of galaxies to intergalactic space. How can your scheme account for the many, and more and more specific, measurements on the velocity of sunshine?
But, what if The entire theory behind the CMBR (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation) is wrong? If the factual data is examined some amazing conclusions are arrived at. Take into consideration that a reasonably well-established estimate of the density of your Universe is always that only 5% of your Universe, like gaseous subject, consists of strong baryonic issue. Which means 95% on the Universe is simply vacant space having a density of about a person particle for every cubic metre of space. If a person replicate on what a large discrepancy exists amongst subject and empty (or Pretty much empty) space some fascinating views occur. Among the list of feelings that concerns thoughts would be that the 95% of your Universe that is nearly devoid of matter (just space club galaxy bar one particle per cubic metre) needs to have an especially reduced temperature. Getting the particle to become Hydrogen, which would seem a likely assumption, a cost-free hydrogen atom in deep space, with no important exterior influences, would proceed getting rid of Power until eventually it reaches an equilibrium state around complete zero. Within the extensive, approximately empty areas of space, which has a density of just one particle for each cubic meter, you can find essentially no collisions to maintain a major kinetic Electrical power. Nevertheless, whether or not the atom alone has an incredibly reduced translational velocity, the electron remains certain in its orbit round the nucleus.
In intergalactic space—the vast expanses amongst galaxies—the density is amazingly lower, with estimates suggesting fewer than a single hydrogen atom for every cubic meter. Conversely, interstellar space—the locations in between stars in just a galaxy—has a higher density, averaging close to one atom for every cubic centimeter, which translates to around one million atoms for each cubic meter."
It's my knowing the Apollo LM could stand at a forty diploma tilt having an vacant descent stage and could consider off at a fifteen diploma tilt. I haven't found something to indicate that landing legs are in the design and my questions remain.
I'm intrigued simply because I've proposed a model of your universe (from my youth a long time ago which was poo pooed at the time) and also have put The reasoning to 2 AIs which have been Performing to 'establish it appropriate (the mathematic support is chatting times of work by both of those to date).
pjbierma reported: Is this a thing that you "Consider" or a thing that you actually "know" with regard to the Starship design and style?